Purpose:
A final-pass checklist for Embassy staff, policy officers, PD teams, and supervisors to validate that a product meets Plain Writing Act requirements and institutional risk standards.
This is not a style guide.
It is a go / revise / stop tool.
A. Pre-Draft Gate (Do Not Skip)
Before writing, confirm yes to all:
- ☐ I can name one primary audience (not “the public”).
- ☐ I know what the audience must be able to do after reading/watching.
- ☐ I know where this will be published (website, X, Facebook, speech, video).
- ☐ I know what this product does not do.
- ☐ I know who owns accuracy and clearance.
If any box is unchecked → do not draft.
B. Structural Requirements (Non-Negotiable)
- ☐ BLUF appears first (first paragraph or first 2–3 spoken sentences).
- ☐ The BLUF answers:
- what this is,
- why it matters,
- to whom.
- ☐ Information is ordered by user need, not by history or process.
- ☐ Each paragraph contains one idea only.
- ☐ Headings describe content, not tone (“Next Steps,” not “Looking Ahead”).
C. Sentence Discipline
Verbs
- ☐ Every sentence has a clear subject.
- ☐ Verbs describe actions, not abstractions.
- ☐ Passive voice is used only when the actor is unknown or irrelevant.
Adjectives & Adverbs (critical check)
- ☐ No adjective is used unless it adds verifiable meaning.
- ☐ No adverb is used to compensate for a weak verb.
- ☐ Words like robust, meaningful, significant, enhanced are either:
- removed, or
- explained with specifics.
D. Word Choice (Plain English Standard)
- ☐ Common words preferred over institutional synonyms.
- ☐ No acronyms without first use spelled out (unless universally known).
- ☐ No internal shorthand (“stakeholders,” “leveraging,” “capacity”) without definition.
- ☐ Technical terms are explained once, then used consistently.
E. Lists, Numbers, and Dates
- ☐ Bullets are used for:
- steps,
- conditions,
- requirements,
- comparisons.
- ☐ Bullets are grammatically parallel.
- ☐ Dates are specific (“since 2022,” not “recently”).
- ☐ Numbers are concrete (“300,” not “many”).
F. Claim / Non-Claim Discipline
- ☐ Every factual claim can be traced to a public, attributable source.
- ☐ Opinions or inferences are clearly labeled or removed.
- ☐ The product explicitly states what it does not claim when ambiguity is likely.
- ☐ No implication of:
- treaty obligations,
- guarantees,
- policy changes
unless explicitly stated in source material.
G. Platform-Specific Checks
Website
- ☐ Scannable headings
- ☐ Short paragraphs
- ☐ Links instead of long explanations
Press / Q&A
- ☐ Direct answers first
- ☐ No hedging adjectives
- ☐ Clear redirect language (“We refer you to…”)
Social Media
- ☐ One idea per post
- ☐ No institutional filler
- ☐ Actionable or informational—not performative
Video / Spoken
- ☐ Spoken syntax (short sentences)
- ☐ No stacked clauses
- ☐ Concrete nouns, not abstractions
H. Final Risk Check (Stoplight)
- 🟢 Green: Clear audience, clear function, clear limits → publish
- 🟡 Yellow: Clear intent, minor ambiguity → revise
- 🔴 Red: Multiple audiences, vague purpose, hedging language → stop
If a supervisor cannot explain the product in one sentence, it is not plain English.
What this checklist already enables
- Consistent quality across Embassy sections
- Faster clearance (less back-and-forth)
- Lower reputational and misstatement risk
- Easier onboarding later (without training yet)
Member discussion: