Here are two equivalent diagrams: a linear chain and a feedback-system view.
A) Linear chain (minimal)
(1) Unauthorized Epistemic Authority
→ (2) Interface as Governance (authority becomes behavior-shaping by default)
→ (3) Compression-Induced Harm (certainty/urgency/caveats erased)
→ (4) Bias as Selective Attenuation (what gets erased follows social gradients)
→ (5) Adoption Without Institutional Comprehension (institutions rely on outputs they can’t audit)
→ (6) Governance as Performance, Not Enforcement (statements/laws lag; mechanisms absent)
→ (7) Scale, Speed, Irreversibility (harm propagates faster than correction)
B) System view (with reinforcing loops)
┌───────────────────────────────┐
│ (7) Scale, Speed, Irreversibility │
└──────────────┬────────────────┘
│ amplifies
(1) Unauthorized Authority │
┌───────────────▼───────────────┐
│ (2) Interface as Governance │
└───────────────┬───────────────┘
│ produces
┌───────────────▼───────────────┐
│ (3) Compression-Induced Harm │
└───────────────┬───────────────┘
│ allocates loss along
┌───────────────▼───────────────┐
│ (4) Bias (uneven attenuation) │
└───────────────┬───────────────┘
│ enables institutional reliance
┌───────────────▼───────────────┐
│ (5) Adoption w/o comprehension │
└───────────────┬───────────────┘
│ triggers symbolic response
┌───────────────▼───────────────┐
│ (6) Governance as performance │
└───────────────┬───────────────┘
│ fails to bind, so harms persist
└───────────────► back into (7)
Key insight of the system view: (7) doesn’t just come “at the end”; it feeds back to intensify (1)–(6) by making remediation slower and less legible.
Member discussion: