Appendix 6 — SPES Data Inputs & Outputs Schema

(Decision-Grade Information Architecture for Public Engagement)

Purpose of this appendix
To define—precisely and non-aspirationally:

  • what data a SPES must actually ingest,
  • where that data comes from,
  • how often it updates,
  • what decisions it supports,
  • and what it explicitly does not attempt to do.

This appendix exists to prevent two institutional failures:

  1. treating SPES as a “communications generalist,” and
  2. drowning the role in data that does not translate into decisions.

6.1 Design Principle (Non-Negotiable)

SPES does not collect data for insight.
SPES collects data for decision constraint.

Every input must:

  • change a choice,
  • bound a claim,
  • trigger escalation,
  • or justify restraint.

If it does none of those, it is noise.


6.2 Core Input Domains (What SPES Must Track)

SPES data inputs fall into six domains, each mapped to a specific decision function.


Domain A — Embassy Public Outputs (Authoritative Voice)

What this includes

  • Press releases
  • Media notes
  • Social media posts (FB, X, IG, YouTube)
  • Ambassador / DCM speeches
  • Op-eds
  • Official statements

Granularity

  • Full text
  • Timestamp
  • Platform
  • Clearance path (if known)
  • Whether later corrected/clarified

Update cadence

  • Continuous (daily ingestion)

Why it matters

  • These outputs are treated as policy by external audiences.
  • SPES must know exactly what has already been said.

Decisions supported

  • Can we say this again?
  • Are we contradicting ourselves?
  • Has the Embassy already implied a position?

What SPES does not do

  • Rewrite after publication
  • Judge tone aesthetically
  • Attribute blame for errors

Domain B — Engagement & Interaction Data (Risk Surface)

What this includes

  • Post engagement metrics (likes, shares, comments)
  • Comment content (sampled)
  • Escalation patterns
  • Media pickup of social posts

Sources

  • Meta Business Suite
  • X analytics
  • Manual media scans

Granularity

  • Post-level, not individual-level
  • Aggregate patterns, not profiling

Update cadence

  • Weekly review
  • Real-time flagging for spikes

Why it matters

  • Engagement reveals where content is being reinterpreted.
  • Comment threads show when PD becomes grievance intake.

Decisions supported

  • Respond / hold / disengage
  • Escalate to Front Office
  • Adjust future framing

Explicit exclusions

  • Individual demographic profiling
  • Sentiment scoring for its own sake
  • Influencer targeting

Domain C — Section & Agency Activity Signals (Internal Reality)

What this includes

  • Section events (Econ, Pol, DAO, CDC, Consular, etc.)
  • Program launches or milestones
  • Agreements, MOUs, shipments, visits
  • Grants, exchanges, trainings

Sources

  • Section calendars
  • Weekly staff meetings
  • Internal emails
  • Front Office updates

Granularity

  • Event-level
  • Program-level

Update cadence

  • Weekly structured intake
  • Ad hoc for sensitive activities

Why it matters

  • Most comms failures occur when PD is surprised.
  • SPES must see activity before messaging pressure hits.

Decisions supported

  • What is safe to message
  • What should stay quiet
  • What requires alignment language

What SPES does not do

  • Approve programs
  • Set section priorities
  • Represent sections externally

Domain D — Policy & Strategy Constraints (Outer Boundaries)

What this includes

  • Integrated Country Strategy (ICS)
  • NSS / NDS priorities
  • State press guidance
  • Travel advisories
  • Visa policy changes
  • Congressional testimony (relevant)

Sources

  • State.gov
  • Embassy cables / guidance
  • Public testimony

Granularity

  • Claim-level
  • Language-level (how things are framed)

Update cadence

  • Event-driven (policy change)
  • Quarterly baseline review

Why it matters

  • SPES must know when older assumptions are invalid.
  • Prevents “ICS ghost logic.”

Decisions supported

  • Is this still aligned?
  • Are we exceeding mandate?
  • What language is now unsafe?

Domain E — Media Environment (External Interpretation Layer)

What this includes

  • Local media narratives
  • Recurrent outlets/themes
  • Politically aligned outlets
  • Social amplification patterns

Sources

  • Daily press scans
  • Media summaries
  • PAO briefings
  • LES insights

Granularity

  • Outlet-level
  • Narrative-level (not article-by-article exhaust)

Update cadence

  • Daily skim
  • Weekly synthesis

Why it matters

  • The Embassy does not control meaning—media does.
  • SPES tracks how outputs travel.

Decisions supported

  • When silence is safer
  • When clarification is required
  • When holding language is enough

Domain F — Audience Architecture (Structural, Not Targeting)

What this includes

  • Known PD audiences:
    • students
    • journalists
    • civil society
    • business community
    • alumni
  • Exchange participation data (aggregate)
  • American Spaces usage patterns

Sources

  • ECA data
  • Fulbright/IVLP records (aggregate)
  • American Spaces reports
  • PD unit inputs

Granularity

  • Program-level
  • Aggregate trends only

Update cadence

  • Quarterly

Why it matters

  • Prevents fantasy audiences.
  • Anchors PD in reality.

What SPES does not do

  • Audience targeting
  • Demographic micro-segmentation
  • Political profiling

6.3 Output Classes (What SPES Produces)

SPES outputs are decision artifacts, not reports for their own sake.


Output Class 1 — Leadership Snapshots

Audience: Ambassador / DCM
Frequency: As needed
Form: 1 page max

Includes

  • What changed
  • What’s risky
  • What not to say

Output Class 2 — Risk Registers

Audience: PAO / Front Office / Legal
Frequency: Living document

Includes

  • Trigger conditions
  • Escalation thresholds
  • Ownership mapping

Output Class 3 — Narrative Drift Reports

Audience: PAO / Section Chiefs
Frequency: Quarterly

Includes

  • Repeated frames
  • Silent gaps
  • Overexposed themes

Output Class 4 — Holding Language Menus

Audience: PAO / DCM
Frequency: Event-driven

Includes

  • What can be said
  • What cannot
  • What to defer

6.4 Input → Output Mapping (Accountability Layer)

Input DomainEnables Output
Embassy OutputsDrift reports, holding language
Engagement DataRisk registers
Section ActivityPreemption briefs
Policy ConstraintsLanguage red lines
Media EnvironmentResponse posture
Audience ArchitectureFraming discipline

If an input does not map to an output, it should be dropped.


6.5 Common Failure Modes (Explicit)

SPES data systems fail when:

  • everything is tracked
  • nothing is prioritized
  • insights are not tied to decisions
  • outputs are descriptive but not constraining

This appendix is designed to prevent that.