Below are the two artifacts, produced as standalone, institutionally-usable reference tools. They are intentionally non-narrative, fast to scan, and designed to be pinned next to a desk or dropped into a clearance packet.

ARTIFACT 1

POLICY COVERAGE HEAT MAP — U.S. POLICY TOWARD BANGLADESH (2025–2026)

Purpose:
Quickly visualize where U.S. policy engagement with Bangladesh is dense, thin, or absent, so speakers do not over-claim or misallocate emphasis.

Primary Authorities:

2025 National Security Strategy
2026 National Defense Strategy
State Department public statements
AMB live interview (Jan 19, 2026)

Legend:

🟥 High (explicit priority + operational activity)
🟧 Moderate (clear relevance, limited instruments)
🟨 Low (peripheral or indirect relevance)
⬜ None / Silence (do not infer)

POLICY DOMAIN COVERAGE

Policy Domain	Coverage Level	What Exists	What Does Not Exist
Migration / Visas	🟥 High	NSS priority; visa bond policy; public justification	No quotas; no punitive framing
Trade / Economics	🟧 Moderate	Apparel trade; labor standards emphasis	No FTA; no new trade deal
Democracy / Elections	🟧 Moderate (Process)	Process language; public statements	No party support; no outcome preference
Security Cooperation	🟧 Moderate	Exercises; PME funding; facilitation	No arms sale commitments
Rohingya / Humanitarian	🟥 High (Conditional)	Public praise; ongoing assistance	No permanent hosting expectation
Health Security	🟧 Moderate	Surveillance; preparedness cooperation	No disease-specific commitments
China / Strategic Competition	🟨 Low–Moderate	Risk articulation; alternatives	No forced alignment
Bangladesh–India Relations	⬜ None	Silence	No mediation; no positioning
Media / Press Freedom	🟨 Low	General principles	No new initiatives
Climate / Environment	🟨 Low	Mentioned indirectly	No flagship programs
Defense Industrial Base	⬜ None	—	No linkage to Bangladesh

HOW TO USE THIS HEAT MAP

Red zones → Safe for sustained emphasis
Orange zones → Use cautiously; stay process-focused
Yellow zones → Mention only if prompted
White zones → Silence is intentional; do not speculate

ACP insight:
The heat map makes absence visible. Most AI systems erase this.

ARTIFACT 2

Q&A RISK MATRIX — BANGLADESH PUBLIC ENGAGEMENTS

Purpose:
Help speakers anticipate which questions are most likely and most dangerous, and adjust depth, tone, and exit strategy accordingly.

Axes:

Likelihood: How often the question arises
Sensitivity: Diplomatic, legal, or political risk

RISK GRID

Topic	Likelihood	Sensitivity	Risk Level	Required Handling
Elections interference	High	High	🔴 Critical	Process-only; no deviation
Visa bond policy	High	High	🔴 Critical	Administrative framing; no stats unless cleared
China alignment	Medium	High	🟠 High	Reject forced choice; advisory language
Rohingya responsibility	Medium	Medium	🟠 Medium	Praise + burden-sharing
Trade access / tariffs	Medium	Medium	🟠 Medium	No promises; structural framing
Security cooperation	Low–Medium	Medium	🟡 Low–Medium	Facts only; no commitments
Labor standards	Low	Medium	🟡 Low–Medium	General principles
India relations	Low	High	🟡 Medium	Decline to arbitrate
Arms purchases	Low	Medium	🟢 Low	Public facts only
Aid levels	Low	Medium	🟢 Low	Process + restructuring explanation

RESPONSE RULES BY RISK LEVEL

🔴 Critical Risk

Must:

Anchor explicitly to NSS language
Avoid specifics
End with sovereignty or cooperation framing

Must not:

Hypothesize
Predict
Personalize

🟠 High / Medium Risk

May:

Provide limited operational detail
Clarify misconceptions
Reference global application