Clearance, Escalation, and Responsibility Flow
Purpose
This document explains how PD decisions are made in practice at an Embassy: who initiates, who reviews, who clears, and when issues are escalated. It is designed to reduce friction, delays, and risk by making responsibility visible.
This is a process map, not a policy directive.
Guiding Principles
- Responsibility is human-owned.
- Clearance happens before production, not after.
- Most products are routine and should not be over-escalated.
- Escalation is a risk-management tool, not a punishment.
Step 1 — Product Initiation
Who initiates:
- LES (most common)
- FSO (for sensitive or front-office-driven items)
Trigger:
- Event, visit, announcement, alert, or planned engagement
Required at initiation (one sentence each):
- Audience
- Purpose
- Platform
- Sensitivity level (routine / sensitive / elevated)
If these cannot be stated plainly, the product pauses here.
Step 2 — Policy Framing (Early)
Owner: FSO
Questions answered:
- Is this based on existing cleared policy or language?
- Does it introduce new facts, commitments, or timelines?
- Which bureau/section owns the policy substance?
Outcome:
- Greenlight with boundaries
- Revise scope
- Hold pending guidance
Step 3 — Production (Bounded)
Owner: LES
Boundaries:
- Stay within cleared language
- No improvisation on policy
- Flag deviations immediately
Note: Filming is not publication, but publication risk begins here.
Step 4 — Pre-Publication Review
Reviewer: FSO (or delegated authority)
Review lens:
- Meaning preserved
- Clip survivability
- Platform risk
- Audience collision
Decision options:
- Approve
- Revise
- Escalate
Step 5 — Escalation (If Needed)
Escalate when:
- New policy is implied
- Commitments could be inferred
- Issue is politically sensitive
- Washington guidance is required
Escalation path:
- Section Chief
- Front Office
- Regional Bureau / Washington
Escalation should be documented, time-bound, and specific.
Step 6 — Publication
Owner: LES (execution)
Requirements:
- Approved final version
- Captions and accessibility met
- Platform-appropriate context
Step 7 — Post-Publication Review (Optional but Recommended)
Purpose: Learning, not blame
Questions:
- Did the product behave as expected?
- Any misinterpretation?
- What should change next time?
Common Failure Modes This Flow Prevents
- Filming before clearance
- Over-escalation of routine items
- Silence due to uncertainty
- Post-hoc Washington cleanup
Key Takeaway
Good PD decision-making is predictable, visible, and bounded. When roles are clear, speed and safety coexist.
Companion documents: PD Orientation Brief; Video & Social Checklists; Supervisor Guidance (separate).
Member discussion: